Wusu, Tacheng Prefecture, Xinjiang, China admin@sinochem-nanjing.com 3389378665@qq.com
Follow us:



2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid: A Comprehensive Commentary

Historical Development

Scientists started taking a real interest in cyclopropane derivatives not long after the 1930s, once it became clear how these strained rings could change reactions and properties in organic molecules. Early researchers spent long hours figuring out how to twist hydrocarbons into a triangle and then slap on functional groups without breaking the fragile bonds. 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (TMCCA) became a molecule worth attention for its compact stability and odd reactivity. Chemists figured out ways to shove bulky methyl groups onto the three-membered ring, pushing the limits of what small rings could handle. This acid started showing up in agricultural research circles, then in pharmaceutical labs, because its analogs offered pest resistance and unique bioactivity. Eventually, TMCCA earned a spot in specialty chemicals catalogs, letting more labs see what these tightly packed carbons could do.

Product Overview

2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid shows up as a firm crystalline solid when pure, sometimes showing off a colorless, almost glistening appearance. Most often, people get it as a reagent for organic synthesis or a building block in advanced chemical research. Producers usually offer it in sealed, light-blocking containers due to its sensitivity to light and air. Buyers include pharmaceutical researchers, agrochemical developers, and even folks working on advanced polymer synthesis. Seasoned chemists look for it by its shorthand, TMCCA, or search for its traditional synonyms on ordering pages thanks to historical naming conventions.

Physical & Chemical Properties

TMCCA owns a distinct molecular formula: C8H14O2. The presence of four methyl groups and one carboxylic acid attached to one cyclopropane ring creates a unique combination of stiffness and chemical behavior. Typically, its melting point falls near 80-83 °C, giving it stability under ambient storage and during most lab manipulations. It generally doesn’t dissolve well in water, but organic solvents like ether and chloroform work just fine. The acid group remains reactive and can be modified, while the methyl groups shield the core, limiting unwanted ring opening. Its high ring strain and steric protection give it a blend of chemical stubbornness and usefulness for synthetic routes requiring tough intermediates.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Suppliers stick to precise purity requirements for TMCCA, often listing a minimum purity of 98% for reliable lab and industrial use. Stoichiometry, melting point range, and storage protocols show up clearly on product labels. GHS hazard codes accompany every shipment, with clear pictograms for irritant and environmental caution according to EU REACH rules and OSHA standards in the US. Certificate of Analysis documents track batch information, confirm analytical results through NMR and IR spectra, and reference supporting safety documentation.

Preparation Method

Synthesizing TMCCA usually starts with tetramethylcyclopropane precursors, which researchers often build from straightforward alkylation of smaller hydrocarbons under high pressure and in the presence of strong bases. Carboxylation steps add the acid function under controlled conditions, using options like Grignard reagents followed by carbonation. Some labs favor using protected intermediates to minimize side reactions and to support purification. Chemical yields depend on controlling temperature and the order of reagent addition, since the cyclopropane ring can snap open from too much heat or mechanical stress. Experienced chemists keep reactions under anhydrous conditions and use inert atmospheres to protect sensitive intermediates.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

TMCCA’s sturdy ring and activated acid group invite several synthetic tweaks. Most modifications target the acid group, swapping it out for esters, amides, or halides, depending on where the chemistry should take things. The ring itself doesn’t open up easily thanks to the two extra methyl pairs, but powerful oxidizers or halogen carriers can sometimes pry it loose. Catalytic hydrogenation leaves the ring alone but can trim or expand sidechains if enough pressure is used. Cross-coupling reactions often exploit the acid’s conversion to acyl chlorides, feeding into further complexity. The molecule’s resilience means it survives harsh conditions that break less protected rings, making it useful where strong bases or acidic environments threaten more fragile frameworks.

Synonyms & Product Names

Beyond the mouthful of its IUPAC designation, TMCCA appears as “2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid” and rarely by older trade names from agricultural chemistry. Some legacy literature uses abbreviations like “TMC acid.” Catalog vendors like Sigma-Aldrich, TCI, and Alfa Aesar list it by CAS number 1461-26-9. Researchers tend to stick to initials and compact names in protocols, both for brevity and to avoid confusion with closely related acids.

Safety & Operational Standards

Handling TMCCA takes some precaution, especially to protect skin and eyes due to mild corrosiveness typical for carboxylic acids. Standard PPE—gloves, splash goggles, and working behind a fume hood—help avoid messy spills and vigorous reactions if the acid splashes onto skin or sensitive surfaces. Inhalation risks stay low unless someone volatilizes a lot at high temperatures, an unlikely scenario outside scale-up zones. Waste collection follows hazardous organic protocols, tagging the acid for incineration with other small-molecule carboxylic acids. Spill response plans in most labs cover neutralization with bicarbonate slurries, minimizing risk of fumes or exothermic reactions. Emergency reference sheets should include information on first aid, stability on contact with bases, and greenhouse gas implications when burnt.

Application Area

This acid finds use where chemists need blocked, sturdy rings that don’t fall apart in the farm field or in a bioactive test tube. Some pesticide makers included TMCCA derivatives in the search for stable, environment-resilient molecules. Pharmaceutical chemists examine its rigid framework as they design enzyme inhibitors or analogs of natural products that rely on locked three-membered rings for function. Polymer researchers experiment with its ring-opening pathways, though the methyl groups make that a technical challenge. A few labs have probed its structure in the hunt for materials that resist UV degradation, given the crowded, shielded core. Rarely, the acid feeds into specialty fragrance chemistry, lending stability and new notes to complex blends.

Research & Development

Research on TMCCA draws attention from innovators aiming for toughened agrochemicals and new approaches to ring pharmacophores. Its structure makes it a favorite scaffold in computational studies, providing real-life examples that match theoretical models of steric hindrance and ring strain. Analytical chemists use it as a testing substrate for new NMR techniques, since the methyl groups produce distinct, easily-resolved signals. A handful of funded projects focus on building machine-learning prediction sets for reactivity, since the acid’s performance lines up well with high-strain test sets. Collaborative consortia sometimes integrate TMCCA chemistry with green synthesis, working to drop the need for toxic solvents or replace rare metal catalysts.

Toxicity Research

Even with its sturdy structure, TMCCA doesn’t escape scrutiny for toxicity. Researchers conducted standard mouse and rat studies to bracket its irritation profile and LD50. The acid lands in the category of “mild irritant” unless concentrated or aerosolized in forced-exposure models. Chronic exposure data remains sketchy, mostly showing up in older Russian and German technical reports. For aquatic environments, TMCCA’s low water solubility limits broad ecosystem risk, but enough material can stress fish and invertebrates, echoing general rules for small carboxylic acids. Human data remains limited to accidental exposure, where typical responses mirror short-lived acid burns or eye irritation. Regulators prefer treating it with all carboxylic acid caution—even when acute risk proves low—because knowledge gaps on long-term effects still exist.

Future Prospects

Chemists keep an eye on TMCCA because new catalyst and eco-friendly techniques could unlock safer, faster syntheses with less waste. Machine-assisted design hints at novel analogs for biotech and farm use, especially as resistance to old pesticides rises. Some startups aim to leapfrog traditional ring-opening techniques, looking for ways to use the crowded core to build hyper-stable polymers or medical imaging agents. Regulatory scrutiny may increase, so chemical suppliers face pressure to support green chemistry certifications and better documentation. Academic labs still value TMCCA as a teaching tool for advanced ring strain, and pharmaceutical companies list the acid’s backbone in early-stage hit libraries. Ongoing toxicity studies in plants and soil models may seal its fate in agriculture, or give rise to smarter, safer versions. The future looks set to combine careful stewardship, technical finesse, and creative application of this unusual, compact molecule.




What are the main applications of 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid?

Unique Chemistry, Practical Impact

Plenty of people have never heard of 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid, yet its presence feels pretty familiar in some chemical corners. Chemists value this molecule for its highly branched, rigid structure, which makes it a useful building block. Pharmaceutical developers appreciate this backbone because it can boost a compound’s stability or resistance to breakdown in the body.

Pharmaceutical Ingredient and Intermediate

Some drug compounds break apart too easily, losing their punch before reaching the body’s tougher problems. Adding a ring-heavy group like tetramethylcyclopropane can make a drug more durable. Medicinal chemists often reach for this acid as a “side chain” when they’re cooking up molecules that need to resist metabolism. That means promising new antibiotics and antiviral agents sometimes owe their shelf life, or effectiveness, to the rugged shape built from this acid. More stable medicine means less frequent dosing and fewer failed therapies in the clinic, outcomes that patients and doctors appreciate.

Agrochemical Synthesis

Fields and orchards depend on inventions at the intersection of chemistry and farming. Custom herbicides, insecticides, and plant growth regulators often draw on small, tough molecules to bring the punch against pests without falling apart in hot sun or rain. 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid crops up as a central piece of several agrochemical products on the market. One example includes pyrethroid insecticides, which rely on this acid’s distinctive framework. Its use in this field means more durable crop protection with less chemical runoff — a win for both yield and sustainability.

Specialized Polymer and Material Science

Synthetic chemists always look for building blocks with the right features for new materials. The highly branched and rigid cyclopropane ring of this compound helps produce polymers that don’t bend or break as easily. By weaving in such strong elements, material scientists craft coatings, specialty plastics, and adhesives meant to last through repeated stress or high temperatures. The acid’s commercial availability opens new doors for advanced electronics, lightweight parts, or even ultra-stable household goods.

Trusted Research Tool

Academic labs reach for molecules like this to understand the effects of structural tweaks on chemical reactions or biological systems. Its unusual cyclopropane core lets researchers probe questions about how shape and rigidity change a molecule’s fate. Insights from such studies ripple out, influencing processes in drug discovery, analytical testing, and chemical engineering. With each experiment, the acid earns a role as a staple in organic synthesis training and research programs.

Why It Matters

The value of 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid stretches beyond the lab bench. Drugs built tougher can save hospitals money and keep patients out of trouble. Fields benefit from sprays that last longer without polluting streams. Materials with backbone stand up to daily wear and tear, making things people rely on more dependable. Knowledge passed between chemists in the pharmacy, the field, and the classroom stacks up, laying the groundwork for the next breakthrough.

Challenges and Responsible Use

Care comes along with power. The same qualities that make this acid valuable — resilience, stability, and reactivity — call for thoughtful handling. Chemical suppliers track usage to guard against misuse in harmful compounds. Researchers publish toxicity and environmental fate studies so industry players and regulators can make sound decisions. Greater transparency and knowledge sharing lowers the chance that these clever molecules end up causing more harm than good.

What is the chemical purity of 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid?

Understanding 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid Purity

Purity in chemicals like 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid shapes everything from research results to industrial product quality. Anyone who’s ever run a synthesis or managed a quality control lab knows how easily tiny amounts of an unknown impurity can throw a wrench into the works. Purity isn’t just about hitting a numerical spec on a label; it goes deeper, affecting reliability and accuracy. For those of us working in science and manufacturing, that single number imprinted on a certificate of analysis carries a lot of weight.

Why Purity Levels Matter in Real Life

Most people in the market for 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid expect at least 98% purity for lab work. If the job calls for pharmaceuticals or agrochemicals, the target climbs above 99%, chasing away doubts about unwanted byproducts. Impure acid alters reactions in unpredictable ways, leading to waste, lost time, and sometimes even jeopardizes safety. I’ve seen research groups spend weeks chasing phantom problems caused by a persistent contaminant lurking at fractions of a percent. Cutting corners on purity only looks like savings until an entire batch gets tossed.

Pitfalls in Testing and Sourcing

Supply chains for specialty acids stretch across different continents. More labs rely on certificates from overseas producers, which sometimes miss the full picture. Testing methods vary: gas chromatography, HPLC, and NMR each uncover different contaminants. Once I received a delivery marked “99% minimum,” but our in-house gas chromatography told another story—trace solvents, plus a sneaky byproduct from the synthesis route. Relying only on paperwork, tempting as it may be, introduces risk.

Quality Issues and Risk Reduction

Anyone buying this acid for research, development, or scale-up production faces a tough balancing act between cost and reliability. Purchasing from suppliers who run regular, transparent analytical checks—ideally with documentation of every lot—reduces surprises. I always ask vendors for detailed impurity profiles and compare those with previous results. Some of the more established chemical suppliers invest in batch traceability tools, making it easier to backtrack if things go wrong.

Solutions for Better Assurance

Uncertainty drops when teams keep a batch retention sample and perform their own periodic checks. High-performance liquid chromatography or even simple titration methods can catch out-of-spec materials before a failure lands. For organizations investing in bulk quantities, setting up a supplier audit or site visit brings more confidence than any digital certificate can offer. I advocate for a short pre-qualification run before approving any new supplier; an upfront delay beats undoing months of work later.

Purity in Practice

Chasing higher purity often costs more per kilogram, but the value shows up in reproducibility and fewer headaches. I’ve found that even minute changes in impurity profile tend to get amplified by sensitive reactions, particularly for catalysts or specialty intermediates. If your work depends on reliable chemistry, chemical purity stands out as the foundation. There’s no shortcut to due diligence—double-checking purity secures your results and protects hard-earned progress. For any project relying on 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid, asking the hard questions about purity up front pays off every time.

How should 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid be stored?

Why Storage Conditions Actually Matter

Anyone who spends time in a laboratory learns pretty early that careful storage habits save a lot of regret. I’ve seen what happens when someone ignores a material’s proper storage needs — chaos, confusion, and sometimes real danger. With chemicals like 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid, some basic mistakes can lead to fires, accidents, or ruined batches. Even a brief lapse, like leaving a cap off or storing a bottle on the wrong shelf, causes trouble. With experience, you realize that simple routines — right label, right spot, right temperature — shield you from unnecessary headaches and keep the work environment safer for everyone.

Direct Sunlight and Heat: Trouble in Disguise

This acid handles direct sunlight and heat about as well as chocolate handles a summer dashboard. Temperatures climb, containers sweat, and chemical stability drops off. Most compound breakdowns I’ve witnessed started with somebody tucking away a bottle near lab windows or too close to steam lines and hot equipment. Dry, cool, and dark storage spots prevent nasty surprises. Refrigeration isn’t required, but a consistent room temperature below 25°C keeps things in check and helps prevent hazardous byproducts. Lighting matters: UV kicks off a lot of unwanted chemistry, so keep containers tucked away from unnecessary exposure.

Sealing Out Moisture and Contamination

I once grabbed a bottle that wasn’t sealed tightly. The label looked fine, but the contents inside had turned lumpy. Air and moisture snuck in, and the acid changed character. This compound is tough, but water and air nudge it along undesired paths. Use airtight containers made from glass or the right kind of plastic. Skip metal, since acids sometimes pick up stray ions that lead to corrosion or weird reactions. Every cap gets twisted tight, and desiccant pouches help mop up stray humidity. With the right closure, you keep moisture and lab debris out, so tomorrow’s sample matches today’s.

Separation from Incompatible Materials

Stories make the rounds about strong-smelling vapors and ruined experiments thanks to careless shelving. Organic acids and oxidizers rarely get along, and I’ve seen minor spills escalate when somebody stored acids with strong bases or bleach. Separate this acid from any strong alkalies, oxidizing powders, or reducing agents. Dedicated acid cabinets with a chemical-resistant liner tend to do the job, especially if there’s a leak or spill — and spills do happen. Grouping by hazard class, not just alphabet, cuts down the risk of accidental mixing when you’re in a hurry.

Labeling and Inventory: Small Efforts, Big Rewards

Labels don’t just help new employees. Full ingredient info, hazards, and the last opened date hang on every bottle. Even in a busy space, good labeling avoids confusion. Regular inventory checks catch expired chemicals before they cause trouble or create disposal headaches. I’ve found more than one nearly empty flask hiding at the back of a shelf, quietly degrading because it hadn’t been tracked.

Better Practices, Fewer Problems

Chemical safety isn’t just for auditors. Good storage habits reflect respect for coworkers, property, and your own safety. Storing 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid with care stops most problems before they start. Practical changes like sealed bottles, smart labeling, and mindful organization prove themselves every single day. Mistakes carry real consequences, and over the years I’ve come to respect the peace of mind that comes from a neat, well-organized shelf. Safety turns into efficiency, and that improves research and keeps everyone heading home at the end of the day.

Is 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid hazardous or toxic?

Digging into the Details

Plenty of chemicals drift through labs, warehouses, and factories without grabbing headlines. 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid doesn't show up in everyday conversations, though anyone handling specialty chemistry runs into such odd-sounding names. It’s a mouthful, but once you drill down into what this chemical does, safety questions start to matter a lot more than its pronunciation.

What Makes This Compound Noteworthy

I’ve seen firsthand that cyclopropane derivatives tend to be reactive. Introducing four methyl groups onto a cyclopropane ring, then tossing in a carboxylic acid, stacks up a lot of molecular strain. Experience has taught me that strained rings don’t just sit quietly—they react or irritate. A search through safety data and technical sheets confirms it. There’s solid evidence showing this class of chemicals can irritate skin and eyes. They won’t vaporize and fill a warehouse with toxic fumes in usual handling, but touching pure 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid could leave a rash or spark red, watery eyes.

Toxicity—Guesswork Isn’t Good Enough

Industry and academic sources reveal animal studies are still thin on this molecule. The lack of deep testing doesn’t mean the chemical is safe—it just tells us that scientists haven’t checked. I’ve watched this pattern unfold over the years. Companies introduce new building blocks for synthesis, race to patent results, and sometimes move ahead before full toxicology catches up. Risk isn’t only about acute poisoning; long-term effects matter just as much, especially for those regularly exposed.

What Current Evidence Shows

So far, safety sheets list the compound as an irritant. There’s no clear proof it causes cancer, birth defects, or nerve damage, though very few long-term studies exist. Without rigorous epidemiological data, workers and researchers skate on thin ice using basic laboratory data. Nobody wants to be a test case, especially since allergic reactions and chemical sensitivities pop up all the time for people working with new molecules.

Workplace Experience Counts

In small-scale synthesis labs where I’ve worked, a splash of organic acid in the wrong spot brightens up the day in all the wrong ways. Gloves, goggles, good ventilation—these aren’t overkill precautions. Splash-resistant coats and eyewash stations take the edge off exposure. I’ve run into colleagues who brushed off minor irritations, then paid for it with sensitized skin a few months down the line. Prevention often beats regret.

Safer Pathways Forward

Across the board, better hazard labeling helps. Long complicated chemical names mean little to a new technician, but clear warnings about irritation or long-term risks make people stop and think. Full-scale toxicology studies cost time and money, but some are crucial, especially as more of these custom chemicals drift into different production streams. For now, anyone using or storing 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid should treat it as a skin and eye irritant, keeping exposure minimal and cleanup prompt. Reasonable respect—never fear—gets you home healthy.

What is the CAS number for 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid?

Navigating the Maze of Chemical Identification

People don’t often stop to think about how scientists keep track of the overwhelming number of chemicals used across labs, industries, and regulatory frameworks. The CAS number system takes center stage in untangling this complexity. It’s not just a string of digits you see folded into the fine print of a chemical catalog—it’s an organizational backbone. For chemists and researchers, finding the CAS number for 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid (55965-23-8) signals more than a bureaucratic detail. This unique number gives everyone working with this molecule a shared language, which means fewer mistakes, improved safety, and reliable sourcing.

Why These Digits Deserve Attention

Chemical names can get long and confusing, especially with similar structures or subtle modifications. During my early days in the lab, I learned the hard way about how a tiny change in a name can set off a completely different reaction, costing time and sometimes making results impossible to replicate. Punching in a CAS number leaves no room for that kind of mix-up. Whether you’re a formulator looking to verify your components or a student piecing together why a reaction stalled, pulling up the CAS record clarifies everything. The database entry covers synonyms, molecular structure, and suppliers. The peace of mind that comes with knowing you have the right compound frees up the brainpower for bigger problems in the workflow.

Connecting Lab Bench Work and Regulatory Frameworks

Regulators don’t base their rules just on names. They track and approve substances using the CAS registry. This practice impacts how chemicals move through customs, get tested for safety, or show up in environmental law. If you ever tried sourcing a rare reactant from halfway across the globe, the absence of a CAS number invites confusion, delays, and sometimes penalties. For people working in environmental health, a clear CAS number speeds up cross-checks against toxicity databases, helping to prevent accidents and long-term exposure risks. Every time I’ve chased down new regulations, the CAS number served as a bridge between scientific knowledge and the rules that try to keep those chemicals from turning from tools into hazards.

Finding Solutions for a Transparent Chemical Supply Chain

Mistakes in chemical identification often lead to safety incidents, wasted money, or environmental trouble. The answer isn’t to memorize every complex name but to bring greater transparency at every step. Digital tools now scan labels and link straight to CAS-backed safety sheets, giving clarity to both new employees and seasoned staff. If regulators, suppliers, and end users stick closely to these identifiers, the risk of miscommunication drops dramatically. The industry moves closer to accountability and trust, laying groundwork for faster recalls and less fraud. Teaching students and new hires to work with CAS numbers doesn’t slow the process; it keeps progress steady and costs predictable.

Emphasizing Accuracy Without Losing Momentum

An academic background in organic chemistry raised my appreciation for precision. Grabbing the right bottle, reading the right data, and logging the right compound ensure that expensive mistakes don’t pile up. Even with chemicals that sound as technical as 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid, a focus on accurate identification pays off. For innovation to continue, people need fast access and clear communication—and CAS numbers are the silent engine running behind the scenes.

2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid
2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid
2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid
Names
Preferred IUPAC name 2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
Other names Clofencet
Permethrinic acid
2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
Pronunciation /ˌtɛtrəˈmɛθɪlˌsaɪkloʊˌproʊpəˈnɛɪkˈkɑːrbɒksɪkˈæsɪd/
Identifiers
CAS Number 1461-26-9
3D model (JSmol) `3D model (JSmol)` string for **2,2,3,3-Tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid**: ``` C1(C(C1(C)C)(C)C)C(=O)O ```
Beilstein Reference 1209286
ChEBI CHEBI:87170
ChEMBL CHEMBL107271
ChemSpider 10320890
DrugBank DB08335
ECHA InfoCard 03b2d7e1-661d-402a-a16f-7d488fd08c2d
EC Number 204-734-8
Gmelin Reference 82880
KEGG C06429
MeSH D010771
PubChem CID 10447
RTECS number GU8575000
UNII 46U60D83SU
UN number UN3334
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID4063136
Properties
Chemical formula C8H14O2
Molar mass 142.20 g/mol
Appearance White solid
Odor Odorless
Density 1.06 g/cm³
Solubility in water Insoluble
log P 2.02
Vapor pressure 0.01 mmHg (20°C)
Acidity (pKa) 4.92
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) −46.69 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol
Refractive index (nD) 1.429
Viscosity 1.08 cP (25°C)
Dipole moment 2.54 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 380.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) –400.7 kJ·mol⁻¹
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) –3229.7 kJ·mol⁻¹
Hazards
Main hazards Harmful if swallowed, causes skin irritation, causes serious eye irritation
GHS labelling GHS05, GHS07
Pictograms GHS05,GHS07
Signal word Warning
Hazard statements H318: Causes serious eye damage.
Precautionary statements P261, P264, P271, P272, P273, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P312, P321, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) 1-1-0-0
Flash point 61 °C (closed cup)
Autoignition temperature 385 °C
Lethal dose or concentration LD50 (oral, rat): 3160 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (median dose): Oral rat LD50 >5000 mg/kg
NIOSH NA0448000
PEL (Permissible) Not established
REL (Recommended) 5 mg/m³
Related compounds
Related compounds Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid
2,2-Dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid
3,3-Dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid
2,2,3-Trimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid
Cyclobutanecarboxylic acid