© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Long before specialty chemicals lined the shelves of research labs, chemists scoured simple hydrocarbons for molecules that could bridge organic structures and performance in the real world. 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane comes from that drive—the synthesis of cyclohexyl derivatives marks a time when tailoring carbon chains for custom needs meant new discovery, not just replication. Development of such molecules surged after the mid-20th century, as modified hydrocarbons promised fresh possibilities for industry, research, and chemical creativity. Personally, digging through old patents and journals, it’s clear: much of today’s applied chemistry builds on these early innovations, where academic know-how blended with ambitions for better solvents, intermediates, and additives.
Not every hydrocarbon gets a nod from both synthetic and industrial chemists—the cyclohexyl group brings greater physical stability, less volatility compared to its straight-chain cousins, and unique solvency properties. Folks who have worked in organic synthesis know the hurdles of using simple alkanes—they lack selectivity, they often evaporate too quickly, or fail under process heat. This compound’s backbone marries the stable, ringed structure of cyclohexane with butane’s manageable length, creating a molecule that offers more control during reactions. Unlike some similar structures, it can dissolve difficult-to-handle organics, yet brings fewer safety concerns than much more volatile or reactive options.
Anyone handling 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane will notice its clear, oily appearance and a faint, hydrocarbon scent. Its melting and boiling points fall logically between the values seen in cyclohexane and n-butane, offering predictability for temperature-sensitive processes. Chemical stability comes from the saturated backbone—no double bonds to spark unwanted side-reactions, which matters during scale-up or pilot experiments. Familiar solvents like hexane and cyclohexane can share some behaviors, but the added chain length tweaks its viscosity and its ability to dissolve larger organic or nonpolar molecules. Pour it into a flask or run it through chromatographic columns—technicians find it stands up well where minor deviations in chain structure could ruin a process. The compound resists oxidation under normal handling. Still, one must remember, like many hydrocarbons, it burns clean yet it shares the stubborn flammability typical for the family.
Product labeling matters as much as the chemistry itself—you want purity specifications, not just an abstract chemical grade. Typical purities come in well above 95%, with residual solvents and moisture content listed for good reason: a few percent of unwanted impurity can trip up yields or react unpredictably. From my lab experience, failure to check GC or NMR data can mean a month of missed work, especially for materials going into downstream pharma or advanced manufacturing. Knowing precise density, refractive index, or spectral data helps people spot cross-contamination before damage sets in. The best suppliers provide more than a batch sheet—they report batch-level details for every run, and that level of transparency saves effort after the product lands on your bench.
Synthesis can start with the Grignard reaction—cyclohexylmagnesium bromide meets butyl halides, and the resulting product usually comes after a round of purification and careful distillation. Not every preparation requires complex catalysts, yet attention to conditions matters—temperature swings, air leaks, or impure materials skew outcomes fast. Some routes rely on transition-metal catalysis, while others favor old-school alkylation. At scale, manufacturers automate and inert the reactors; losing a run to spontaneous combustion or trace oxygen costs real money. Often, smaller-batch preparation in academic labs can be finicky, showing more side-products than one would care to see. Solid purification routines—like column chromatography and fractional distillation—never get old. For anyone intending to repeat these reactions, patience, dry glassware, and a nose for trouble go further than any theoretical recipe.
The cyclohexyl group isn’t just for show—it gives chemists a point to modify or build out further reactivity. Trade journals and conference posters show countless attempts to oxidize, halogenate, or otherwise modulate this structure, especially in work on specialty surfactants and lubricants. Cross-coupling reactions, hydrogenations, and even bio-catalytic steps have been run on derivatives, all seeking either a new function or a better yield. For end-users in synthesis, these modifications turn foundational hydrocarbon chemicals into building blocks for drug intermediates, polymers, or functionalized additives. This hands-on landscape rewards those who can spot a niche and exploit it, whether plotting retrosynthetic schemes or troubleshooting separation steps.
Naming quirks follow any molecule with roots in both academic and industrial circles. 1-cyclohexyl-N-butane sometimes pops up as cyclohexylbutane, or as its IUPAC name, often with chain positions tweaked based on how synthetic routes attach one end to the ring. Registries like PubChem and CAS stick with the formal structures, yet real-world catalogs list a handful of synonyms. Anyone seeking it for reactive chemistry or as a standard often cross-references several names—mistaking numbers or substituents leads to frustrating errors, especially when placing orders or interpreting older patents. In practice, knowing the common codes as well as the systematic naming saves costly mistakes.
Chemists with field experience know that safety standards start with clear eye protection and good ventilation. Although cyclohexyl-N-butane presents lower acute toxicity than arylated or halogenated cousins, its flammability sets clear boundaries for its use near heat or open flame. Ignoring the lower explosive limit—a real concern for laboratories and plant settings—puts lives and hardware at risk. Respiratory protection often comes into play, particularly during scale-up or in poorly ventilated areas. Material Safety Data Sheets carve out known effects, yet anyone handling chemicals at volume knows actual risk depends as much on habits and procedures as on raw toxicity numbers. Even with low-to-moderate irritancy, splash accidents, prolonged skin exposure, or improper waste disposal can add up over a career. I’ve seen minor spills escalate quickly—no substitute exists for practicing drills and using enforced chemical hygiene.
In the real world, 1-cyclohexyl-N-butane finds itself valued in research, analytical chemistry, and specialty industrial sectors. As a solvent, it influences reaction kinetics, especially for non-polar reactants or where polar impurities cause problems. In materials science, its unique structure helps tune the physical properties of composite materials, coatings, and even certain adhesives or sealants. Those who formulate surfactants, lubricants, or specialty cleaning agents often pick this molecule for its stability and the way it interacts with both organic and inorganic residues. In pharma and agrochemical research, it serves as a test solvent or as a basis for derivatives with more biological function. Real-world case histories show it popping up in custom organic syntheses where both volatility and reactivity must be balanced. The value here comes not just from what it does alone, but from the way it helps tune more complex formulations.
The ongoing story with 1-cyclohexyl-N-butane rests in how researchers tweak its structure to open doors in synthesis, drug development, and materials. Modern labs combine computational models with hands-on work to predict reactivity and optimize new derivatives. Spectroscopists and analytical chemists test trace impurities, reaction by-products, and minute modifications, often publishing new reaction pathways or methodologies. Some teams push into enantioselective modifications, while others seek greener, safer routes for synthesis—aligning with sustainable chemistry goals and regulatory demands. Active collaboration shows up in conference halls, where applied researchers swap new experimental findings with those focused on industrial scale-up. The global push for less hazardous, more efficient solvents and additives drives research funding and patent activity, ensuring this molecule’s future isn’t just about the old ways of hydrocarbon chemistry.
Toxicologists have spent meaningful time teasing out the acute and chronic effects of aliphatic hydrocarbons like this one. Acute exposure to vapors or skin contact rarely produces major injury under controlled settings, but large-scale or repeat exposure brings real risk—central nervous system effects, skin dryness, or minor respiratory irritation turn up in occupational studies. Rodent data shows low oral and dermal toxicity, yet anyone who’s worked in process chemistry knows indirect risks can matter just as much—fire, vapor accumulation, or combined exposures with more hazardous reagents deserve focus. Chronic toxicity, mutagenicity, or carcinogenicity data remains limited for this particular molecule, so prudent users treat it with respect, applying limits common to its chemical family until long-term studies clarify the unusual risks. Worker training, routine monitoring, and timely updates to safety practices reflect the best way to keep research and operations productive, not hazardous.
As regulatory bodies push industry toward lower environmental impact, chemists double down on creative solutions—developing bio-based precursors, advancing recycling routes, and lowering by-product waste from hydrocarbon processing. 1-cyclohexyl-N-butane stands out as a candidate for structural modification, making it a base for designer solvents or functional intermediates built with safer, renewable methods. Demand for smart materials and complex drug molecules brings chances for derivatives that outperform traditional alkanes, while tighter emission controls reward clean combustion and minimal toxicity profiles. It’s heartening to see academic labs and industry teams push for transparency, tracking environmental persistence as much as performance. My own experience watching colleagues turn “old” molecules into new solutions echoes a real truth: innovation comes from honest research, shared data, and responsible risk management, not just clever synthesis. With the right persistence and collaboration, tomorrow’s applications will both solve immediate problems and respect broader health and environmental priorities.
Chemistry often flies under the radar, despite its heavy impact on daily routines and vital industries. 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane represents one of those specialty chemicals you don’t see on a store shelf, but its influence spreads wide. This compound pops up in the kind of technical applications that keep other sectors humming, whether in specialized research, advanced manufacturing, or materials science innovation.
The backbone of this compound lies in its carbon structure. That cyclohexyl group, attached to a butane tail, equips it with stability and flexibility. Think of molecules like loose puzzle pieces in design labs: scientists blend and modify them, building from the ground up to solve a challenge or spark a new function.
In practice, research labs often use 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane as a starting material or auxiliary. Synthesis of new specialty chemicals often relies on backbone structures like this, allowing chemists to build complexity in stages. Sometimes, pharmaceutical labs depend on molecules with certain carbon chains when devising new drug frameworks or testing reactivity.
Beyond chemistry benches, certain industries use this type of molecule to modify materials. Small tweaks in chemical structure can shift a plastic’s durability, impact resistance, or solubility profile. This makes a difference in everything from automotive engineering to coatings. I’ve seen firsthand how new compound building blocks often mean lighter, stronger, or more flexible materials. It’s these tweaks that fuel advances—like making wearable devices thinner or protective gear more reliable.
Specialty chemicals present a balancing act. On one hand, they offer possibility—for scientists, inventors, and innovators. On the other, safety concerns must be met squarely. Not every lab or plant can handle molecular building blocks without strict protocols. Exposure to unfamiliar hydrocarbons can cause skin, eye, or respiratory irritation. Inhalation risks or chemical burns underline why safety teams place so much training on proper storage and handling of compounds like this.
Trusted suppliers, clear labeling, and secure containers stand as the front line of safety. Regular audits, compliance with region-specific regulations, and strong documentation support both accountability and rapid response whenever an issue comes up. This sort of diligence separates committed labs and manufacturers from those cutting corners.
Not all progress looks flashy, but the chase for smarter molecular design brings value. Safer alternatives, biodegradable materials, and non-toxic derivatives continue to earn investment and research dollars. Many companies are studying how to fine-tune molecules for high performance—without added risk, lingering pollution, or hazardous waste.
As someone who’s seen product development up close, every advance has ripple effects. New raw materials can lead to products that last longer, work better, or break down harmlessly after use. Cooperation between chemical companies, regulators, universities, and end-users helps fill knowledge gaps and keep benchmarks high for environmental and health standards.
Staying informed makes all the difference. Knowledge lets us weigh the benefits of innovation against real human and environmental costs. That’s always worth advocating for, whatever the molecular formula.
1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane doesn’t show up in home cleaning cabinets. This compound, sitting at the edge of research and certain production lines, carries a set of traits every handler must respect. The cyclohexyl group brings bulk, and the n-butane backbone keeps it oily and not water-friendly. Both features ask for serious care in storage and transfer. Years working around organics tell me to never trust a clear liquid on appearances alone.
Many folks check a chemical’s name and shrug if warnings don’t jump off the page. I’ve seen that lead to burned hands or headaches, because research into toxicity often takes years. For 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane, there’s not a stack of toxicity reports like with solvents known for decades, but calling it harmless would be a mistake. Structures similar to hydrocarbon solvents often mean skin irritation and trouble breathing vapors. Even minor spills paint a clear lesson — if an organic compound smells strongly, your body’s already taking in the low-dose warning.
My time in labs has shown how quickly a slippery, oily chemical can end up on handles, gloves, and even necklines. Given that many hydrocarbon derivatives break through regular nitrile gloves, I reach for specialty protective gear. Not because the safety team says so, but because I’ve seen cheap gloves dissolve fast under the wrong splash, forcing hand-washing breaks every few hours. Just one distracted touch brings that chemical closer to someone’s skin, and not everyone reacts the same.
Energy gave us chemistry, sure — but it brought fire risks, too. 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane, built from flammable backbones, turns any mistake with static, sparks, or hot equipment into an instant emergency. Most old-timers in the lab know the smell of burning solvent. No one wants firefighting foam sprayed over years of hard work. That’s why grounding drums and keeping amounts small makes sense, even if code books don’t force it in every case.
Some folks think air hoods and splash goggles feel like overkill for certain substances, then learn tougher lessons later. I keep memories of tight rooms and bottled-up vapors to remind myself to test the airflow, not just assume it runs strong. Air sensors earn their keep by turning blue when risk starts to creep up. Without proper air movement, even a few drops on the bench can leave fumes strong enough to spin a headache or worse.
Manufacturers, researchers, and quality teams see eye-to-eye on clear labeling. A chemical that’s handled with vague safety sheets becomes a hazard by neglect, not nature. Pushing for better disclosure of hazards, whether in a small plant or a large-scale site, helps everyone wake up to the invisible dangers. Responsibility carries through in small actions: storing containers away from heat, insisting on labeled shelving, or double-bagging waste streams.
As guidelines trickle down from national safety boards, real learning often happens student to student, or co-worker to rookie, with reminders about double gloves, fitted goggles, and never rushing procedures. I remind anyone training with new compounds: “Respect every bottle like it holds the worst case.” So, is 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane safe? Only in the hands of someone who’s unwilling to gamble with shortcuts, and trusts good habits over wishful thinking.
1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane doesn’t show up on most folks’ radars, but any chemical with this kind of structure brings clear risks that can’t be shrugged off. Flammability sits near the top of the list. Vapors from this compound can catch fire with only a little spark. Even a small static charge can start something disastrous. Stories from labs that didn’t take these facts seriously serve as warnings, not rumors.
A colleague once worked overnight in a secondary storage room and didn’t notice the old ventilation system humming its tired song. No flames showed up, but the smell of solvent hung heavy the entire shift. Later, checking storage charts and Material Safety Data Sheets, it was obvious—they stored solvents close together in rooms where one fan filtered the air for a dozen different chemicals. It was only a matter of time before luck ran out.
There’s no overreacting on storage for 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane. Drums and bottles go onto shelves far from sources of ignition—think light switches, motors, and even cellphones. Dedicated chemical storage cabinets with thick, spark-proof doors won’t win design awards, but keep the risk of fire at bay by reducing vapor escape.
Leak-proof containers are non-negotiable. If vapors get into the air, workers and researchers add health hazards to the fire risk. Organics like this one irritate eyes and skin and cause headaches that creep up after a long shift. Emergency training at a warehouse I once visited made every employee, senior or new, demonstrate proper labeling and secondary containment—because mistakes didn’t just ruin a spreadsheet, they could destroy an entire facility.
Dry, cool conditions help slow down any chemical reaction, and that’s just as true here. Sunlight and high temperatures push vapors to build pressure, sometimes popping lids or causing minor leaks. Indoor spaces with controlled air and humidity cut down on this risk. Even rowdy summer weather outside can’t do much if there’s a properly ventilated indoor room and alarms set to ring at the first hint of heat or fumes that rise above normal.
People mean well but fall into shortcuts: putting containers near a hot water system to save a walk, or skipping logbooks because the process “takes too long.” These decisions might save a minute, but cost plenty later. There’s a factory north of the city that got cited after a surprise inspection—old tubs stacked up without dates, dust layering vent grilles, and no up-to-date training certificates on the wall. The chemical load was small, yet it still triggered an expensive overhaul for everyone on site.
Routine checks every day keep risk down. If something leaks or a container feels sticky, there’s no debate—remove it fast and clean the area with the right materials. Documentation builds habits: checklists on the wall and reports that supervisors actually read, not just sign. Training makes the big difference. A team that’s rehearsed spills and fire scenarios will react fast, whether during business hours or in the dead of night.
Sensors for flammable vapor, real ventilation, and caution near open flames round out a strong storage system. The commitment isn’t only about ticking boxes. It respects the lives of workers and keeps business running without interruptions that come from ignoring what can go wrong.
1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane—nobody keeps this sort of chemical around unless there's a specific industrial reason. It sits in the back room, not by accident, but because it’s tricky stuff. People working with chemicals every day know the danger isn’t in how exotic the name sounds; it’s the potential for harm. Fumes, skin contact, or just plain improper handling can lead to health problems, environmental headaches, and possibly legal trouble. Folks might wonder, “Is it like tossing out paint or expired aspirin?” Not even close.
Throwing chemicals in the trash or down the drain looks easy until you think about where that stuff ends up. Water treatment plants handle a lot, but not the breakdown of complex or hazardous organics. I know from years of community workshops: one careless pour can cause toxic run-off and waterway contamination. It only takes one. Sewers don’t magically erase risk—they shuffle it along, often straight into local rivers or lakes.
Proper disposal means putting safety above shortcuts. Trained chemical waste specialists earn that label for a reason. They track the chemical from storage to incineration or secure landfill. It’s not glamourous, but it works. According to the EPA, only certified hazardous waste facilities handle these compounds in a way that neutralizes toxins and prevents groundwater problems. Label every container. Keep it sealed. Store it somewhere with controlled temperature and clear signage until pickup.
Relying on the internet for quick disposal fixes leads people in circles. Instead, most cities have hazardous waste collection days or drop-off centers. Calling local environmental departments or hazardous waste contractors beats guessing. Even small towns have a process. Industrial generators track disposal through manifests and signatures at each step, so there’s a paper trail if something goes wrong. The point isn’t to bog down users in red tape—it’s about accountability from start to finish.
I’ve seen what follows after someone “just throws it out.” Someone faces a hefty fine, yes, but it’s the environmental fallout that leaves a mark. Soil contamination sticks around. Rivers struggle to recover long after the incident disappears from local headlines. Cleaning up after mistakes costs communities more than handling disposal right the first time.
People handling chemicals can look for safer substitutes when planning projects. Green chemistry isn’t just an industry buzzword. Many labs and manufacturers switch to less hazardous chemicals to cut down on future headaches. Training workers—not just supervisors—prevents most accidents. Over the years, I’ve watched companies reduce not only their hazardous output but also injury rates and disposal fees.
Every person in the chain, from lab tech to facilities manager, plays a role. Careful labeling, secure storage, following the rules on the data sheet—all that matters as much as any high-level regulation. We all owe it to our neighbors, coworkers, and families to make sure what gets used doesn’t end up where it doesn’t belong. Safe disposal isn’t some bureaucratic hurdle. It’s the practical choice, supported by science and experience.
Let’s break down what “1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane” could mean in terms of its chemical structure. Customarily, chemistry sticks to standard naming. The phrase seems to patch together a cyclohexyl group and a butane chain. In structure, cyclohexyl refers to a six-carbon ring shaped like a hexagon, each point a carbon atom, all single-bonded in a puckered chair conformation. N-butane points to a straight chain of four carbons. So, “1-cyclohexyl-n-butane” would probably refer to a molecule where the cyclohexyl group attaches to the first carbon of a butane chain. The resulting formula would look like C10H20. The core attaches the cyclohexyl group to butane’s terminal carbon, so there’s a longer hydrocarbon molecule topped by a familiar six-membered ring.
Organic chemistry classes often drive home the importance of understanding how molecules snap together. When students see a compound like this, they picture the carbon ring and the alkane tail and immediately start thinking about potential behaviors. The way these pieces fit changes everything about safety, stability, and functionality. For folks working in manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, or even fuels, a small detail in the structure can spell the difference between a simple solvent and something that breaks down plastics.
People sometimes overlook how a little side group can change physical properties. Take melting or boiling points. Cyclohexyl groups, with their bulky structure, tighten molecular packing or disrupt it, based on the surrounding atoms. A straight butane chain attached to a cyclohexyl ring usually ends up making the molecule less volatile than pure butane. The hydrophobic character gets stronger, meaning the molecule avoids water and prefers mixing with oils or organic solvents—a critical feature in industrial formulations.
Working with any novel hydrocarbon, safety always steps up as a top concern. Longer chains with cyclic groups sometimes bring higher flashpoints, but that isn’t always enough. Many cycloalkanes have narcotic effects if inhaled, or cause skin and eye irritation. Because they don’t dissolve in water well, cleaning up spills gets tricky. Since cyclohexyl compounds pop up in rubber manufacturing and as solvents, I’ve always pushed for gloves and proper ventilation, even in minor lab work.
Regulators tie their rules directly to molecular structure, too. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) keeps tabs on cyclohexane derivatives in industrial runoff, since some degrade slowly and spread into groundwater. Before scaling up use or production, companies must check these rules. Even disposal requires some research, since some municipalities treat cycloalkanes as hazardous waste.
Whenever a new cycloalkyl compound surfaces, I check the safety literature and industry use-cases. Sometimes, alternatives outpace the original in safety or sustainability. For example, in paints or adhesives, manufacturers often weigh the performance of cyclohexylbutane against less toxic, biodegradable options. Green chemistry pushes for renewable feedstocks or molecules that break down quickly in nature. Making that jump takes time, lab resources, and a willingness to challenge old habits in industrial plants.
Understanding this structure isn’t just about naming. It opens up questions about how substances behave in labs, ecosystems, or on a shop floor. Everyone involved—from research chemists to environmental technicians—needs to know not just the name, but the kernel of structure behind it. That knowledge steers choices, practices, and the future of safer chemistry.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | N-butylcyclohexanamine |
| Other names |
Butane, 1-cyclohexyl- N-Butylcyclohexylamine |
| Pronunciation | /ˈwʌn saɪkloʊˌhɛksɪl ɛn bjuːˌteɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 17330-36-6 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `JSmol('1CC(NCCCC)C2CCCCC2')` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1736904 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:90799 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL138737 |
| ChemSpider | 22855599 |
| DrugBank | DB14194 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 40d30b53-f3a4-4acb-852a-1462d242ef4d |
| EC Number | 620-422-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 293176 |
| KEGG | C16272 |
| MeSH | Cyclohexyl Compounds |
| PubChem CID | 15556339 |
| RTECS number | HL6475000 |
| UNII | X9U22L97Q8 |
| UN number | UN1993 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID60895498 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H21N |
| Molar mass | 169.30 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.862 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 2.9 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.702 mmHg at 25°C |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~50 |
| Basicity (pKb) | Estimation: pKb ≈ 3.3 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -85.05×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.448 |
| Viscosity | 0.863 cP |
| Dipole moment | 2.02 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 465.7 J/mol·K |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | No data found. |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | N01AX05 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H225, H304, H315, H336, H411 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P233, P240, P241, P242, P243, P264, P280, P303+P361+P353, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P337+P313, P370+P378, P403+P235, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-0 |
| Flash point | 64 °C |
| Explosive limits | Explosive limits: 1.0% - 6.0% |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 400 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL for 1-Cyclohexyl-N-Butane is not specifically established by OSHA. |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.2 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | IDLH: Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
N-Butylcyclohexylamine Cyclohexylamine N-Butylamine Cyclohexane Butylamine |
