Chemistry often takes shape through a blend of theory, trial, and demand. For a long time, urea derivatives piqued the interest of researchers looking to tackle both environmental and pharmaceutical challenges. Scientists first explored aryl ureas, hoping to tap into their strong hydrogen bonding, structural flexibility, and ability to act as intermediates in complex syntheses. 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea surfaces from this active landscape, its design reflecting decades of accumulated learning on how to marry aromatic amines and isocyanates, along with the rich functionality of nitroaromatics and pyridine-based motifs. The path to this compound came from repeated iteration, informed by the medical community’s search for antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and agricultural traits, and the chemical industry’s need for building blocks that could tolerate or accept further functionalization. Reading back into the scientific archives, researchers in Japan, the USA, and Europe spotted patterns in urea derivatives that led directly to this molecule, especially as exploration of heterocycle-containing compounds expanded after the 1970s boom in medicinal chemistry.
1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea stands out as more than another academic curiosity. Research chemists appreciate its dual-core structure: the pyridine ring provides distinct chemical reactivity and coordination sites, while the nitrophenyl group allows for easy tracing and measuring in analytical work. The molecule often lands in the inventory of both basic researchers and application-driven development teams. Its urea linkage not only strengthens the molecule by bridging two distinctive aromatic systems but often aids solubility and directional hydrogen bonding. In my own lab work, similar compounds often open doors to reaction mapping and mechanistic insights not possible with simple substituted benzenes.
The solid form typically appears as a yellowish crystalline powder—nitroaromatics rarely stray from these hallmark colors. As for handling, the compound isn’t overly volatile, but it doesn’t appreciate long stints at elevated temperatures. Moisture uptake presents a moderate risk, especially in humid climates, so tight, dry storage helps preserve quality. The nitro group on the phenyl ring can act as either a handle for further chemistry or a flag for sensitivity to reducing environments. In polar organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetonitrile, the urea often dissolves with ease, but choices like toluene and hexane rarely pull their weight. The molecule resists hydrolysis under neutral and mild alkaline conditions but tends to succumb when faced with strong acids or bases. Most chemists can anticipate some photostability concerns, as nitroaromatics can slowly degrade under intense light, so amber glassware isn’t a luxury, it’s basic good sense.
In the lab, clarity and traceability matter, so vials carry detailed labeling on batch number, synthesis route, and the level of trace impurities, especially heavy metals and residual solvents from the final purification step. IR, NMR, and HPLC profiles provide much-needed confidence for any downstream application or regulatory review. Users expect tight limits on water content, ensuring predictable reactivity and shelf life. It’s always best to also post melting point and appearance data, given that polymorphic differences, while rare in this case, can trip up even experienced users. No one wants to find their compound’s physical attributes in question midway into a project.
Many chemists prepare 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea through condensation of 4-nitrophenyl isocyanate and 3-pyridylmethylamine in an aprotic solvent at low to moderate temperature. Reaction times vary, but mild stirring and addition of a weak base help control pH and promote coupling. Direct crystallization often follows after a water quench, since the product shows low solubility in cold water. Recrystallization from ethanol or ethyl acetate polishes the purity and can boost assay outcomes. Controlling temperature, especially during isocyanate addition, acts as a safeguard against runaway exothermicity—a lesson you don’t soon forget after one near-miss.
Anyone who’s worked with substituted ureas knows they can act as both nucleophiles and electrophiles. The nitro group on the phenyl ring directs further substitution, allowing for reduction to an amine, which itself becomes a springboard for diazotization, coupling, or Sandmeyer-type transformations. The urea linkage holds steady under many reaction conditions but opens up possibilities for N-alkylation or even ring-forming reactions with additional reagents. The pyridine ring’s basic nitrogen serves double duty: it can attract metals for organometallic studies or react with electrophiles in N-oxidation pathways. If a group needs to anchor a catalyst or append fluorescent tags, this molecule often meets the brief better than many simpler alternatives.
Chemists sometimes call it 1-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea or use slightly different IUPAC conventions, depending on how the methyl linkage gets indexed. Catalogs may bundle it among aryl-ureas or label it as a nitrophenylpyridine urea derivative. Having seen more than one mailing label foul up what seemed a straightforward order, I always suggest marking both a common and systematic name on inventory forms. Clear naming keeps supply chain confusion and misidentification at bay—no trivial matter when conducting regulatory audits or compiling MSDS paperwork for regulatory review.
Anyone reaching for nitroaromatics knows they fall under extra caution. Skin and eye contact can spark irritation, and inhaling the fine dust affects mucous membranes. Short stints of exposure usually don’t cause lasting harm, but longer or repeated handling, especially without gloves or fume extraction, spells risk. Storage near reducing agents or flammable solvents demands thoughtful separation. Procedures always call for goggles—chemical burns don’t play favorites. In the rare event of a spill, teams mop up with absorbent pads, and solvent rinses follow, but avoiding dust clouds matters more. Proper record-keeping goes hand in hand with periodic safety reviews, and newer labs strive for chemical handling training refreshers every quarter. Waste management doesn’t come cheap, but it beats the fallout from regulatory noncompliance and environmental slipups.
Most activity for this compound unfolds in research settings. Medicinal chemists explore its role as a template for drug discovery, leveraging the electron push and pull of nitro and pyridine rings to shape binding profiles. Agrochemical researchers sometimes dig into it as a prototype for herbicide leads, as its core motif can disrupt plant enzyme systems. Analytical laboratories lean on its unique UV absorption and chromophore presence to serve as a marker or internal standard. In some cases, specialty polymer chemists want its structure for supramolecular assemblies or to tune hydrogen-bonding networks in sensor platforms. Compared with legacy aryl ureas, its double aromatic system and tailored substitution pattern often spark new thinking, which ripples across lead optimization projects, patent filings, and pilot-scale syntheses.
As the world’s chemical frontiers keep shifting, there’s an uptick in teams applying computational chemistry to predict new derivatives with better biological or material properties. Multinational collaborations feed off each other’s data, and open-access journals push new findings into public view with record speed. High-throughput screening approaches tag this molecule for libraries, especially in kinase or G-protein coupled receptor inhibitor programs. Having worked on a few parallel projects, it’s plain that finding solubility, metabolic stability, and patentability means returning often to 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea as a benchmark. As green chemistry concerns rise, new syntheses seek to trim hazardous reagents and solvent waste, pushing for microwave-assisted or solid-phase alternatives that keep labs—and the environment—safer.
Efforts to pin down toxicity haven’t cataloged dramatic hazards, but caution still marks every step. The nitroaromatic nature prompts teams to run Ames and micronucleus testing, while attention also goes to off-target effects on enzymes and red blood cell function. So far, acute oral and dermal studies in standard animal models point to moderate hazard levels, below those of classic nitrobenzene or TNT, but above many non-aromatic amide compounds. Many regulatory bodies watch accumulation potential, knowing that even mild persistence in the environment or slow biotransformation in mammals can add up to chronic exposure risks. For all research-grade quantities, teams operate on the “treat as hazardous” principle, blending good sense with legal mandates.
Looking ahead, the role of dual-functional urea derivatives seems set for expansion across both new drug design and next-generation sensors. As more is learned from machine-learning-predicted structure activity relationships, derivatives could address antimicrobial resistance or improve crop yields with less environmental downside. Academic partnerships, industry-funded consortia, and nonprofit initiatives jointly move the needle on making scalable, greener syntheses standard. Efforts to dial back waste and keep energy consumption in check align with global climate and sustainability goals. For graduate students or startup innovators, 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea represents not just another compound, but a touchstone for what’s possible at the intersection of synthetic chemistry, policy, and creative problem-solving.
1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)urea might sound like a handful, but the name holds clues about its architecture. Imagining this molecule is like setting up two unique puzzle pieces: a 3-pyridylmethyl group and a 4-nitrophenyl group. Both latch onto either side of a central urea core. The pyridine ring sits attached by a methylene chain—think of it as a short carbon bridge. On the other side, a benzene ring sports a glaringly obvious nitro group at its para (4th) position. The urea unit acts as the central glue, connecting both rings through nitrogen atoms. The molecular formula works out to C13H12N4O3.
Many people glance at a complicated IUPAC name and check out mentally. But learning to see what these names are pointing to unlocks stories about how molecules behave. The connectivity between rings and the presence of certain groups like nitro or methyl means a lot in chemistry. The nitrophenyl group, for example, stubbornly holds to its electron-withdrawing role, yanking charge through resonance and induction. This affects physical properties and can make or break biological activity. Functional groups act as tiny managers determining how the molecule relates to solvents, proteins, or light.
Folks in medicinal chemistry circles tend to perk up when they see urea derivatives carrying diverse ring systems. Ureas pop up in everything from pharmaceuticals to agrochemicals, mainly due to their ability to form key hydrogen bonds. Both pyridyl and nitrophenyl groups stand out for specific reasons: pyridine rings often boost water solubility or nudge a molecule across biological membranes; nitro groups turn up the reactivity dial and may pave routes for further chemical tweaking or even direct biological action.
When I think back to my laboratory days, wrestling with stubborn intermediates, a properly designed molecule made everything easier. Changing a methyl to a pyridyl, or adding a nitro group, could flip the results overnight. What paper descriptions never quite express is how much personality lives inside a structure—an amine might send a compound into a friendly handshake with a protein, while a nitro group can sometimes grind interactions to a halt, or even spark new possibilities altogether.
While the design looks good on paper, the synthesis sometimes wears down even the most patient chemists. Introducing both a nitro group and a pyridine ring, properly positioned, means staying alert during every purification step. Impurities can sneak in, and nitro groups can trigger unexpected reactions. Scale-up comes with its own headaches, given the sometimes tricky solubilities and sensitivity to reduction or hydrolysis. A researcher can spend days just tweaking conditions to get a clean batch.
Researchers have published studies on related urea compounds for years, especially pointing out how electron-withdrawing or donating groups attached to aromatic rings alter binding strength in protein-ligand interactions. Drug candidates based on a similar framework demonstrated activity as kinase inhibitors and antiparasitic agents. Journals like Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry regularly showcase new modifications in the search for better absorption, efficacy, or safer side-effect profiles. The nitro group’s presence, apart from being a reliable spectroscopic handle, also drives further modifications by reduction to amines or other derivatives.
Solving the synthesis puzzle depends on clever planning. Chemists often seek out milder, more selective reactions, avoiding fuss over hazardous conditions. Green chemistry principles suggest water-based reactions, minimized waste, and safer starting materials. Some teams use simulations and computational models to check how tiny modifications affect activity even before mixing a drop of solvent. Bridging the lab and computer saves money, time, and trouble. Real progress grows from such careful design and relentless curiosity about what every structure can offer.
The world of organic chemistry rarely turns curious heads outside the lab, but 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea deserves a closer look. Named for its unique structure—melding a pyridylmethyl segment with a nitrophenyl-urea backbone—this compound attracts attention in research circles for good reason. I first encountered its name during a seminar on modern drug design, and I’ve noticed it keeps coming up not just in textbooks, but in practical settings where real-world impact matters.
Lab notebooks often tell stories about urea derivatives, and this one is no stranger to brainstorm sessions focused on pharmaceutical research. Its structure looks promising for building blocks in kinase inhibitors. Researchers chase these molecules because kinases guide cell growth and communication—runaway kinase activity links to cancer or inflammatory diseases. Structures like this urea let chemists tinker with molecular designs, giving birth to molecules packed with possibilities. In my experience, even early studies hint that a compound like this can show solid binding to protein targets involved in disease, breathing life into projects looking for new therapeutic leads.
Biology thrives on tools that track or tweak activity inside cells. 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea brings some useful traits to the table for developing chemical probes. For example, the nitro group on its aromatic ring can provide a “handle” for attaching labels or trackers. Some labs exploit this to light up or flag certain processes during microscopy or diagnostic assays. I’ve seen it used as a parent structure to link fluorophores for experiments checking where certain cancer-related receptors hide inside crowded cellular neighborhoods.
Enzyme research closely follows the trail of new urea derivatives. Given their ability to mimic peptide bonds, compounds like this tend to block proteases and other enzymes through structural trickery. Lead optimization sometimes leans on molecules that resist breakdown. That resistance can push forward studies of longer-term effects in cell models and animal tests. The nitrophenyl part often delivers electronic effects needed for creative tweaks in potency or selectivity. My own curiosity led me to scan at least a dozen articles where researchers used it as a launchpad for tailoring inhibitors against specific targets—from chronic inflammation to bacterial virulence.
Research doesn’t stop at human health. Organic urea derivatives sometimes find their way into sensor design and advanced material development. The combination of electron-deficient and electron-rich sections helps create charge-transfer complexes that matter for electronics. Engineers value the predictable behavior of these molecules in field-effect transistors or as part of organic crystals. Academic researchers often mention the stability and layering properties, opening the door to new sensor platforms or semiconducting films.
It takes vigilance to ensure that molecules with laboratory promise stay safe for both researchers and the environment. Strict documentation and safety reviews guide every step in the life of experimental compounds. Collaboration between chemists, toxicologists, and regulatory experts shapes how discoveries travel from bench to bedside or commercial shelf. From my observation, the most thoughtful teams build in green chemistry principles, investing in waste reduction and safer handling protocols.
References show that behind each complex formula stands a community determined to turn chemical possibility into real-world benefit. By treating each new compound as a tool, not just a curiosity, science keeps moving closer to breakthroughs that matter in medicine, diagnostics, and materials innovation.Many folks step into science labs drawn by curiosity or career, but chemicals such as 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea demand careful respect. Time in any laboratory has shown me that cutting corners or skipping safety checks brings trouble fast. Even highly trained chemists slip up when they start seeing routine as safety. I lost count of stories where someone didn’t wear goggles, spilled a strange powder, or used open hands to scoop up glass without thinking. All it took was one “harmless” shortcut to land someone in the emergency room.
Few people have heard about 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea outside of a research setting. But this compound blends a nitrophenyl group — something flagged as a health hazard and potential environmental toxin — with a pyridine base, giving it both reactivity and persistence. Exposure to nitroaromatic compounds often means trouble for your skin or lungs. The risk of long-term health effects pushes up when repeat contact or inhalation goes unchecked.
Experience tells me never to trust an unknown powder. Always treat 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea as hazardous. Lab coats and safety goggles belong on, not draped over a chair. I layer up with nitrile gloves and sometimes throw on a face shield if the dust risk runs high. Sinks and soap sit close by for a reason; if chemical dust touches your skin or eyes, an instant rinse beats delayed regret.
Work inside a fume hood, not the open bench. Even small operations stir up dust and trace vapors that hang around. Proper ventilation protects lungs and keeps your workspace clean. Years in the lab show again and again that poor airflow ramps up health risks, even when substances seem low-risk by the book.
Keep solid chemicals in tight, labeled containers. Once I saw a junior researcher re-use an old solvent bottle for a new urea-type compound; the label confusion led to a risky mix-up. Segregate storage from acids, bases, and oxidizers. If a spill hits the bench or floor, sweep up with wetted towels or speckled absorbent – never dry sweeping, which only puts particles in the air. Waste needs proper containers, sealed and tagged according to hazard class. Regulations might look tedious, but they exist because experience taught the hard way.
Old-timers in labs know panic only worsens an emergency. Every researcher should memorize the location of safety showers, eyewash stations, and first aid kits before opening a bottle. Quick action makes all the difference, especially with potent compounds like this one. Report any exposure, even if the skin looks clean or symptoms seem minor. Early medical intervention tackles hidden toxic effects before they take hold.
Bottom line: safety isn’t a one-person job. Training runs deeper than a one-time slide show. Sharing stories of near-misses and close calls with newcomers sets the right tone. Buy-in from everyone — from new students to lead researchers — keeps the whole team protected. Keep up-to-date on guidelines and chemical safety literature, because recommendations change as new risks and data emerge. Real safety comes from people looking out for each other and refusing to treat any chemical as routine.
Solubility holds a big stake in chemistry, both in research and industry. You add up the number of compounds washed down the sink just because they didn’t dissolve as expected, and it reaches a pretty impressive figure. Some molecules sink like bricks in water, while others vanish before you know it. The structure of 1-(3-pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea fits that tricky “in-between” spot scientists deal with every day—aromatic rings, a urea core, a nitro group for good measure.
Picture this molecule: lots of aromatic content, a nitro group hanging off the end, and a urea in the middle. Water, with its love for polar friends and hydrogen bonds, struggles here. The nitro and urea regions can play along, but those aromatic rings put up a barrier. Lab sheets and research forums have circled around this topic, and you don’t see much evidence for good solubility in water. Trace amounts might drop in, but you’ll watch undissolved flakes clinging to the side of a test tube longer than you’d like.
People who’ve worked with urea derivatives know the game changes as you roll out different solvents. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethylformamide (DMF) rise to the top every time—these are like universal remotes for challenging organic molecules. Reports, often from synthetic chemistry labs tinkering with related compounds, show that DMSO takes in millimolar quantities of even stubborn, multi-ring molecules. Ethanol handles some, especially if there’s a bit of heat, but you still see leftovers on the glassware. Chloroform joins the party for molecules carrying enough nonpolar character, and this urea’s triple ring count fits.
Practical folks don’t waste time pushing molecules into solvents where they clearly don’t want to go. In drug discovery, agricultural research, or specialty material development, time counts. If you find yourself needing to study 1-(3-pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea, you reach for DMSO first. You mix in small increments, use mild warmth, and don’t try to force a saturated solution unless you love troubleshooting precipitation. Many chemists get burned swapping solvents mid-experiment, only to realize that minute impurities and microcrystals are skewing their data.
You won’t find published, peer-reviewed numbers for every exotic molecule under the sun. Most of us lean on functional group logic and community experience. If you need a ballpark—think in the low milligram range per milliliter in DMSO, perhaps much less in water. Trial runs, using analytical tools like UV-vis or HPLC, confirm how much actually dissolves instead of trusting color or cloudiness. Those who work with stubborn compounds keep a stash of co-solvents or surfactants if ultimate solubility matters, though those come with their own quirks and interferences.
Far too many productive hours vanish because critical solubility data isn’t shared in an accessible way. Journals and chemical suppliers often list generic values—"sparingly soluble," "soluble in organic solvents"—leaving researchers guessing or repeating the same bench experiments others already sorted out. Open-access resources and more thorough supplier data solve headaches for everyone, and this isn’t just a matter of convenience. Better solubility data means less waste, higher experiment quality, and faster innovation.
Making the most out of 1-(3-pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea usually means skipping straight to trusted organic solvents. Valuable, reliable data—not just educated guesses—savess labs money and nervous energy. Next time a scientist stands at the bench with a cloudy beaker in hand, clear guidelines turn uncertainty into progress.
Lab professionals rarely wave off chemical storage as just another chore. Anyone who’s dealt with delicate compounds knows uncertainty in stability ruins days of work and budgets. 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-Nitrophenyl)Urea stands as a good example here. It enters the lab as a white or off-white powder, sensitive to a handful of environmental triggers. A slip in storage care can turn what should be a high-purity reagent into something that throws off entire assays.
Years spent in both academic and industry settings have shown just how fragile organic ureas can get. Light hits these compounds pretty hard, sometimes leading to slow degradation or color changes no one wants to see at the bottom of a vial. Leaving bottles in clear glass on a sunny bench can shorten shelf life fast. Researchers often choose amber glass or opaque containers, tucking them away from open shelving.
Temperature matters too. Heat speeds up breakdown, nudging reactions that shouldn’t happen until actually planned. Cooling the storage space — usually, a traditional refrigerator at 2 to 8°C — slows decomposition and protects the intended purity. It’s tempting to set everything in a deep-freeze, but condensation sneaks in with repeated thawing, so moderate refrigeration balances protection without creating icy surprises inside the vial.
Water vapor also creeps into small cracks or poorly sealed lids. Even if the urea isn’t water-soluble, persistent humidity introduces risks of hydrolysis or surface clumping. My lab mates learned early on to use tightly sealed containers with good gaskets, often double-bagging powders that need long-term retention. Desiccators with active drying agents get heavy use in well-organized chemical storage rooms. These simple steps make a real difference in purity over time.
Manufacturers pay special attention to packaging for a reason. Transfer to smaller vials introduces contamination almost overnight, especially if tools touch the compound repeatedly. I’ve watched routine sub-sampling gradually turn pure stock into an unusable mess. The trick: Keep ultra-clean spatulas, use minimal hand contact, and draw only what’s needed for the day’s protocol.
Sloppy labeling causes confusion that wrecks reproducibility and safety. It’s easy to overlook, but proper records — date of arrival, date opened, storage temperature, supplier’s batch, and observed changes in color or texture — build trust in each analysis downstream. In one lab, we implemented a simple spreadsheet and color-coded tapes. Even during audits, nobody missed a beat finding the right bottle or tracing back storage history.
Small lapses in these routines have real consequences for research and production. Expired or contaminated material inflates waste, cost, and time, and the value of a simple storage protocol makes itself clear over many cycles of use. Investing in proper storage infrastructure pays itself back — not just with cleaner results, but in keeping researchers and technicians focused on genuine science instead of chasing preventable errors.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea |
| Other names |
NSC 643496 1-(3-Pyridylmethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea |
| Pronunciation | /waɪn θri pɪˈrɪdɪlmɛθɪl θri fɔːr ˈnaɪtroʊˌfɛnɪl juˈriːə/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 383155-83-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1535957 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:94143 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3311183 |
| ChemSpider | 21542734 |
| DrugBank | DB08435 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 21b2a064-cb55-41d7-b4c6-3ae59a1ce5bd |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: 858424 |
| KEGG | C11393 |
| MeSH | D000082277 |
| PubChem CID | 10549821 |
| RTECS number | UY4370000 |
| UNII | D74LX8J08Y |
| UN number | Not assigned |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4078390 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C13H11N5O3 |
| Molar mass | 319.29 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.40 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | slightly soluble |
| log P | 1.17 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.7 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb = 9.12 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -64.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.624 |
| Dipole moment | 7.90 Debye |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 317.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -69.92 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | N07BA01 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P271, P272, P280, P302+P352, P321, P362+P364, P333+P313, P501 |
| Flash point | Flash point: >110°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50: 610mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RN9712V2B68 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
1-(3-pyridylmethyl)-3-phenylurea 1-benzyl-3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea 3-(4-nitrophenyl)urea 1-(3-pyridylmethyl)urea |